<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The No-Way-Both-Ways Neocon-Repug Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/baloney/the-no-way-both-ways-neocon-repug-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/baloney/the-no-way-both-ways-neocon-repug-rules/</link>
	<description>She drinks, you know.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirigo</title>
		<link>http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/baloney/the-no-way-both-ways-neocon-repug-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-2859</link>
		<dc:creator>dirigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/?p=1229#comment-2859</guid>
		<description>Who is politicizing science?

What part of the political spectrum is that coming from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is politicizing science?</p>
<p>What part of the political spectrum is that coming from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmp</title>
		<link>http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/baloney/the-no-way-both-ways-neocon-repug-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-2857</link>
		<dc:creator>rmp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/?p=1229#comment-2857</guid>
		<description>I was distracted and wrong not to look at your links. The one by Bolt was better as a refutation than anything else I have seen although I am not a scientist so I can&#039;t evaluate it. Do you have the link to the 31,000 scientists and 9,000 PhDs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was distracted and wrong not to look at your links. The one by Bolt was better as a refutation than anything else I have seen although I am not a scientist so I can&#8217;t evaluate it. Do you have the link to the 31,000 scientists and 9,000 PhDs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heru-ur</title>
		<link>http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/baloney/the-no-way-both-ways-neocon-repug-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-2856</link>
		<dc:creator>heru-ur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/?p=1229#comment-2856</guid>
		<description>Do you think the ~ 31,000 USA scientists that signed a petition against the global warming hysteria should all be fired from their various positions as &quot;bordering on the foolish&quot;? With over 9,000 with PhDs on the list, that means we are giving out advanced degrees to utter fools!

RMP, I knew you would not look at the picture in the one link or read the very short newspaper article in the other link --- I know how hard it is when your religion is shown to be wrong. When it snows in Orlando, will you at least read a newspaper article that goes against your faith?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think the ~ 31,000 USA scientists that signed a petition against the global warming hysteria should all be fired from their various positions as &#8220;bordering on the foolish&#8221;? With over 9,000 with PhDs on the list, that means we are giving out advanced degrees to utter fools!</p>
<p>RMP, I knew you would not look at the picture in the one link or read the very short newspaper article in the other link &#8212; I know how hard it is when your religion is shown to be wrong. When it snows in Orlando, will you at least read a newspaper article that goes against your faith?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirigo</title>
		<link>http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/baloney/the-no-way-both-ways-neocon-repug-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-2855</link>
		<dc:creator>dirigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/?p=1229#comment-2855</guid>
		<description>This why this country has become a laughingstock, with it&#039;s &quot;faith-based&quot; initiatives and it&#039;s absurd, hypocritical &quot;family values&quot; politicians.

A lot of the natives are still buying this stuff (but fewer we hope), but not too many others (I&#039;d bet), people outside the country who can actually think and discuss such things as the scientific method.

I think I&#039;ll go buy some Texas high school science books.  Read up on the problem with polar bears slipping off their little slabs of ice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This why this country has become a laughingstock, with it&#8217;s &#8220;faith-based&#8221; initiatives and it&#8217;s absurd, hypocritical &#8220;family values&#8221; politicians.</p>
<p>A lot of the natives are still buying this stuff (but fewer we hope), but not too many others (I&#8217;d bet), people outside the country who can actually think and discuss such things as the scientific method.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll go buy some Texas high school science books.  Read up on the problem with polar bears slipping off their little slabs of ice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmp</title>
		<link>http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/baloney/the-no-way-both-ways-neocon-repug-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-2853</link>
		<dc:creator>rmp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/?p=1229#comment-2853</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to take the time to do your research. The world&#039;s scientists have thoroughly studied global warming, they have very substantial facts to back up their conclusions, it has been more than proven without any self-serving hysteria. Those who claim that global warming isn&#039;t happening are in the very small minority. Your claims border on foolish and I don&#039;t usually find you that way. This is the last you will hear from me on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to take the time to do your research. The world&#8217;s scientists have thoroughly studied global warming, they have very substantial facts to back up their conclusions, it has been more than proven without any self-serving hysteria. Those who claim that global warming isn&#8217;t happening are in the very small minority. Your claims border on foolish and I don&#8217;t usually find you that way. This is the last you will hear from me on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heru-ur</title>
		<link>http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/baloney/the-no-way-both-ways-neocon-repug-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-2851</link>
		<dc:creator>heru-ur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/?p=1229#comment-2851</guid>
		<description>dirigo,

It would be nice to get real science on that issue and many, many more. To get &quot;real science&quot; we will have to figure out how to stop the politicization of science, and I am truly afraid that will not be possible in this country for a long, long time.  

Perhaps we can hope for other scientists in other countries to come forward with facts instead of self-serving hysteria? Maybe. Who knows? (but, they will have trouble getting published)

Investigate how American science is funded and controlled someday to see why I am pessimistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dirigo,</p>
<p>It would be nice to get real science on that issue and many, many more. To get &#8220;real science&#8221; we will have to figure out how to stop the politicization of science, and I am truly afraid that will not be possible in this country for a long, long time.  </p>
<p>Perhaps we can hope for other scientists in other countries to come forward with facts instead of self-serving hysteria? Maybe. Who knows? (but, they will have trouble getting published)</p>
<p>Investigate how American science is funded and controlled someday to see why I am pessimistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirigo</title>
		<link>http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/baloney/the-no-way-both-ways-neocon-repug-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-2848</link>
		<dc:creator>dirigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/?p=1229#comment-2848</guid>
		<description>I have a question:  Why can&#039;t a permanent, presidential commission be appointed with, if necessary, de facto &quot;cabinet-level&quot; status, to determine whether or not there is a scientific basis for global warning?

Or not.

Just do it.

Then all the screamers on this issue can scream about other things: like wayward Republicans, the myriad threats to the &quot;culture,&quot; or whether Americans should have to drive cars as small as basement freezers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question:  Why can&#8217;t a permanent, presidential commission be appointed with, if necessary, de facto &#8220;cabinet-level&#8221; status, to determine whether or not there is a scientific basis for global warning?</p>
<p>Or not.</p>
<p>Just do it.</p>
<p>Then all the screamers on this issue can scream about other things: like wayward Republicans, the myriad threats to the &#8220;culture,&#8221; or whether Americans should have to drive cars as small as basement freezers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heru-ur</title>
		<link>http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/baloney/the-no-way-both-ways-neocon-repug-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-2842</link>
		<dc:creator>heru-ur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/?p=1229#comment-2842</guid>
		<description>RPM,

Another story from down under. 

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25401759-25717,00.html

&lt;blockquote&gt;


Andrew Bolt

April 29, 2009 12:00am

IT&#039;S snowing in April. Ice is spreading in Antarctica. The Great Barrier Reef is as healthy as ever.

And that&#039;s just the news of the past week. Truly, it never rains but it pours - and all over our global warming alarmists.

Time&#039;s up for this absurd scaremongering. The fears are being contradicted by the facts, and more so by the week.

Doubt it? Then here&#039;s a test. 

...

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It is only a Media news story, but I don&#039;t think you can blame Republicans or other scary monsters for this one. Can you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RPM,</p>
<p>Another story from down under. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25401759-25717,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25401759-25717,00.html</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Andrew Bolt</p>
<p>April 29, 2009 12:00am</p>
<p>IT&#8217;S snowing in April. Ice is spreading in Antarctica. The Great Barrier Reef is as healthy as ever.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s just the news of the past week. Truly, it never rains but it pours &#8211; and all over our global warming alarmists.</p>
<p>Time&#8217;s up for this absurd scaremongering. The fears are being contradicted by the facts, and more so by the week.</p>
<p>Doubt it? Then here&#8217;s a test. </p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It is only a Media news story, but I don&#8217;t think you can blame Republicans or other scary monsters for this one. Can you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heru-ur</title>
		<link>http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/baloney/the-no-way-both-ways-neocon-repug-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-2841</link>
		<dc:creator>heru-ur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/?p=1229#comment-2841</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;The Neocons-Repugs shout it’s colder than last winter somewhere, somehow so all those thousands of world scientists are blowing smoke about global warming even though the Neocons-Repugs have no scientific proof other than their gut feeling and having spent a long time on our planet.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

So you are saying that you are unaware of any credible, scientific challenges to man-made global warming? If you are, how does one avoid knowing about these challenges? How does one &lt;i&gt;not know&lt;/i&gt; that those who propose extraordinary theories need produce extraordinary evidence to back it up. And no, computer models that do not even consider the main greenhouse gas are not scientific evidence. Nor do the many weather stations across America placed in parking lots with air conditioner exhaust (the heat) pointed at them count as anything other than fudging the data to get the results you already want. See front page of http://www.surfacestations.org/ for an example of each type.

RPM, when I was young I thought the crazies early in our countries history who believed in witchcraft and so forth were gone forever. I was dead wrong. The planet has been cooling for a decade and the last two winters set records world wide. Of course, data that is contrary to a theory is tossed out in modern science now that it is so politicized. 

I&#039;ll let you bluster on, but it is the highth of hypocracy to claim that only neo-cons or Republicans think that your new weather religion is heifer dust. Many of us have seen data that points to the &lt;b&gt;sun&lt;/b&gt; as the source of weather variation on this planet. The Sun, perhaps you have heard of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;The Neocons-Repugs shout it’s colder than last winter somewhere, somehow so all those thousands of world scientists are blowing smoke about global warming even though the Neocons-Repugs have no scientific proof other than their gut feeling and having spent a long time on our planet.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>So you are saying that you are unaware of any credible, scientific challenges to man-made global warming? If you are, how does one avoid knowing about these challenges? How does one <i>not know</i> that those who propose extraordinary theories need produce extraordinary evidence to back it up. And no, computer models that do not even consider the main greenhouse gas are not scientific evidence. Nor do the many weather stations across America placed in parking lots with air conditioner exhaust (the heat) pointed at them count as anything other than fudging the data to get the results you already want. See front page of <a href="http://www.surfacestations.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.surfacestations.org/</a> for an example of each type.</p>
<p>RPM, when I was young I thought the crazies early in our countries history who believed in witchcraft and so forth were gone forever. I was dead wrong. The planet has been cooling for a decade and the last two winters set records world wide. Of course, data that is contrary to a theory is tossed out in modern science now that it is so politicized. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll let you bluster on, but it is the highth of hypocracy to claim that only neo-cons or Republicans think that your new weather religion is heifer dust. Many of us have seen data that points to the <b>sun</b> as the source of weather variation on this planet. The Sun, perhaps you have heard of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmp</title>
		<link>http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/baloney/the-no-way-both-ways-neocon-repug-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-2840</link>
		<dc:creator>rmp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 04:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cocktailhag.com/blog/?p=1229#comment-2840</guid>
		<description>No. I can only take so much Repug virus exposure. It depends on what your definition of dumb is. To me, he is dumb in terms of both slyness and versatility when you compare him to someone like Rep. Darrell Issa of CA or Sen. Lindsey Graham of S.C. They are very intelligent and far more sly in the way they apply their Neocon-Repug rules. Boehner acts like a man perpetually ready to stick his bone in and could care less about the circumstances or audience. His subtleness in technique belongs with the Three Stooges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. I can only take so much Repug virus exposure. It depends on what your definition of dumb is. To me, he is dumb in terms of both slyness and versatility when you compare him to someone like Rep. Darrell Issa of CA or Sen. Lindsey Graham of S.C. They are very intelligent and far more sly in the way they apply their Neocon-Repug rules. Boehner acts like a man perpetually ready to stick his bone in and could care less about the circumstances or audience. His subtleness in technique belongs with the Three Stooges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

