Happy Birthday, Tricky Dick



Today former President (!) Richard Nixon would have been 100, and I’m sorry the ol’ creep isn’t still around; since he would undoubtedly be in a very bad mood.  You see, his most infamous legal doctrine, “if the President does it, it is not illegal,” once a shockingly outrageous statement, is now comfortably enshrined as bipartisan consensus; the open corporate bribery that laid him low has been approved by his former nemesis, the US Supreme Court, and all manner of Government spying on citizens once considered anathema are now as American as Nixon’s favorite treat, cottage cheese and ketchup.

As it turns out, Tricky Dick was just unlucky enough to be born about 50 years too early; in the rosy dawn of the 21st century Presidents can openly take bales of cash from corrupt casino moguls and telecom monopolies, wantonly bomb countries out of pique or political calculation, prosecute and/or legally harass legitimate critics,  and intimidate (what’s left of) the news media.  And even in Tricky Dick’s wildest dreams, he couldn’t possibly have envisioned a day when he could just kill people he didn’t like, but here we are.  As something of a Nixon scholar, I’ve often mused about whether Nixon might have finished out his term had he been bolstered by the bell-bottom equivalent of Fox News, but I don’t think so anymore.  He wouldn’t need it.

Significantly, Dick Cheney and Karl Rove cut their gnashing teeth in the Nixon White House, and had they dedicated their lives to making Nixon’s worst abuses standard procedure, they could hardly be more delighted with the results.  And since they did dedicate their lives to this dubious endeavor, quite openly, I’m sure their only regret is that today they can’t share their triumph with their old boss.  As Digby pointed out today in an excellent comment on this subject, the Republican Party of today isn’t the party of Reagan, but of Richard Milhous Nixon, God rest his putrefying soul.

The terrors that haunted Nixon are the same terrors that haunt Republicans today: academia, Hollywood, the “liberal” media, darkies, hippies and what have you, to which Muslims, gays, environmentalists, atheists, unions, immigrants, women, and public servants have been helpfully added to suit the times.  Like Nixon, Republicans are completely unable to refute the messages of any of these groups, so they methodically demonize the messengers.  Thus, a fictitious “majority,” whether of the silent or moral variety, is relentlessly badgered into a state of false victimhood against anything but the real sources of its anxieties.

And who better to help Republicans bring back the polyester era than the guys who brought us polyester in the first place?   Yet rogue industries like petrochemicals aren’t the only ones to have leapt on the pre-Watergate corporate free-for-all, and today’s are bigger (and kookier) than ever.  While Sheldon Adelson may be a little less crazy than Howard Hughes, he doesn’t have to sneak around when financing Presidents, and he had many fewer billions to toss in the street.  Likewise, the oil industry has consolidated to the point where four phone calls will bring a tsunami of cash wherever it might help, and this fact alone assures that the money might never be needed.

Which brings us back to the role of the media in bringing to life what Rick Perlstein called, appropriately, Nixonland.  It is a land of conformity, paranoia, unaccountable and secretive government, casual repression, and simmering resentments.  It’s a place where powerless groups are pitted against each other over transparent distractions while the elites clandestinely divvy up the spoils.  Most of all, it’s a country that shuns not only self-government, but the very idea of the Rule of Law.  All of this might have rightly struck Americans as, well, un-American, in an era when the news media was still robust, competitive, and diverse, but those days are over.

Nixon got the ball rolling when he signed the Newspaper Preservation Act, which in the guise of maintaining editorial diversity, allowed one corporate entity to own both (or even all) newspapers in a given town, and the message was heard as loudly and clearly as were his later threats to withhold licenses from critical broadcasters:  subservience to government could be better for the bottom line than anything like real journalism.   Later, Reagan eliminated the Fairness Doctrine, allowing AM radio to degenerate into a right-wing fever swamp, and Clinton followed on his round heels with the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which whittled the news media even further, from a dozen or so owners to the handful we are left with today.   Today, the Obama FCC is poised to let Rupert Murdoch go ahead and buy both the LA Times and the Chicago Tribune, even though he already owns major TV stations on both markets.

I’m glad Nixon never lived to see this day, but I’m deeply chagrined that I have.




  1. michlib says:

    And among Tricky D’s most lasting ” contributions ” to Resmuglicanism was the ” southern strategy “, which appears to be morphing into a ” southern only ” appeal.

  2. cocktailhag says:

    Indeed, but just as it’s ended up a little pesky in the long run, it’s been disturbingly enduring, not o mention reliable, in †he short.
    The smart money isn’t counting on any change right away.

  3. RUKidding says:

    Gah! The “legacy” of Tricky: Southern Strategy, Darth Cheney, and KKKarl Rove. ptoui!

    Amazingly enough, if Tricky was still available to kick around, he’d be considered insanely liberal by today’s standards. Don’t forget that he did pass the Clean Air Act which drives present-day conservatives insane with rage. And going to China was actually viewed as a rather Communistic thing to do back then.

    No love lost on Nixon. I couldn’t believe all the fawning tributes to him upon his death. Then again, as you point out: Tricky opened the door for all these crooks, murderers, thieves and con-artists to do their “thing” with impunity, so I guess it’s no wonder that they all wished to pay their Master homage.

    • cocktailhag says:

      I just read about the “birthday party” in Politico today, and I was more than a little revolted. Sheesh, Henry Kissinger, Pat Buchanan and what have you… Just a rogue’s gallery of slimeballs, cooing over their hero.
      Nixon did some okay things, but that’s a product of the time, and he usually did them for the wrong reasons.

      • RUKidding says:

        BARF. I plumb forgot about SlimeBall in Chief, Henry the K. Yeah, I can just imagine those dirty bastards fapping around their Satanic Masters Request and humping his coffin. Why not? They certainly *benefited* royally from all the criminal activities they’ve engaged in both domestically & internationally, all while laughing their asses off at how gullible and malleable most of the US sheeple are, esp the ever-so-moralistic Onward Christian Soldier types… that was Pat Buchanan’s role to herd them into line. Sad to say, Buchanan did a damn fine job with that.

        Again: ptoui!

        • RUKidding says:

          And one more thing: you’ve also brought back painful memories of my rightwing parents bending themselves into pretzels *defending* Tricky & his criminal venal activies. Other than the assissination of JFK, that was the next nail in the coffin that indicated our goose was cooked.

          For my moralistic, Church-going parents to connive to say that Tricky was all A-OK, despite being so totally busted…. I mean: hypocrisy much, Mom & Dad?? Those were the days of: Don’t trust anyone over 30 for good reason.

          They’re “excuse” for excusing Tricky of his criminal activies?? I quote verbatim (it is blazed into my memory banks): “Everyone else does it! Sainted Tricky is just the ‘one that got caught’!”

          WTF????? How can one take anyone seriously with that kind of “Logic”??? Should we NOT bust *anyone* who commits a crime simply because they “happened to get caught”?? My ‘rents predictably got mad & started yelling at me, when I asked that question.

          Typical. The more things change, the more they stay exactly the same….

  4. RUKidding says:

    BTW I still remember watching that first televised debate between Tricky & JFK… where Tricky was sweatin’ bullets & looked like a deer in the headlights. Another Tricky legacy: the beginning of the TV presidency and politicians marketed to a gullible populace as just “good guys.”

    • cocktailhag says:

      And don’t forget Roger Ailes……

      • nswfm says:

        Some obituaries that I’m looking forward to reading, pics to deface with the devil horns and big fork thingies.

        • cocktailhag says:

          I can’t remember who it was who said (I paraphrase out of laziness), “I’ve never killed anyone, but I’ve often read an obituary with pleasure.”
          That was me with Nixon.

          • mikeinportc says:

            ^ I know I’ve heard that too , but not sure where. Whether or not it was him originally, I hear it in Gore Vidal’s voice.
            I would guess that the Dick’s “greatest” legacy is probably those vile creatures that he hired, that still haunt us . “Big” Dick being chief among them. Maybe as damaging as John Foster Dulles.

  5. dirigo says:

    The problem, as Chekhov once said, is: “We need new forms.” Try this one on for size.


    Swallow this and I can arrange for you to buy a capsized Italian cruise ship at salvage.