Who’d a thunk?
CHNN NEWS FLASH!
Karl Rove said something truthful… I hope you’re sitting down. He called Maureen Dowd, among other true things, “bitter, deranged, snarky, nasty,” and such. All true, but Karl being Karl, then he lied, when he said her nastiness was aimed only at conservatives, something that would surely make the Clintons gawk in amazement.
He had me going there for a second.
He forgot partially embalmed. This can happen when your
thanatologistcosmetologist mistakes formaldehyde for botox.(I hear that Karl’s guy foresakes both for lard supplements.)
….and the Pillsbury dough boy from hell coughs up another whopper, after eating too many of same.
I had a nearly identical set of reactions… good grief! I agree with Krove about something? Ooops! not quite.
Of course. Truths are only sneaked in to ready the field for the lie.
To Karl,
All the best …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ojXKbYFnus
But Hag, the Clintons are conservatives. Mrs. Clinton could arguably be called a neo-con to boot.
Not to a partisan carnival barker like Rove. The Clintons were hippie-tainted 60′s leftists, bringing down civilazation just as surely as George McGovern. Don’t give me that crap.
You and I know the Clintons are to the right of Nixon, but Rove doesn’t deal in facts, only his personal “Mein Kampf.”
The same thing that makes him think MoDo is a “liberal.”
I agree with you, but I can not do Rove-think even in jest. I makes my head hurt.
I hope you have a lot of Ibuprofen handy. “Rove-think” is what passes for political discourse these days.